- Y Mun Woo (yook.woo@irh.scot.nhs.uk), staff grade in nephrology1,
- Susan Crail, specialist registrar in nephrology2,
- Graham Curry, consultant physician3,
- Colin C Geddes, consultant nephrologist1
- 1 Renal Unit, Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock PA16 0XN,
- 2Renal Unit, Western Infirmary, Glasgow,
- 3Medical Unit, Inverclyde Royal Hospital
- Correspondence to: YMWoo
- Accepted 14 April 2006
Colonoscopy is a common procedure in modern health care. A prerequisite for good quality colonoscopy is adequate bowel preparation. Various methods are available, which are also used for diagnostic radiological and surgical procedures. One such agent, the oral sodium phosphate solution (Fleet Phosphosoda, C B Fleet, Lynchburg), has become increasingly popular as an alternative to gut lavage preparations since a report of its use in colonic cleansing in 1990.1 This acceptance is largely due to the smaller volume required for ingestion, with a recommended dose of 45 ml of sodium phosphate diluted with water, given at two intervals 12 hours apart (http://www.phosphosoda.com/). Numerous studies have documented its efficacy and higher patient preference and compliance.2 Furthermore, it is cheaper than other forms of bowel preparation agents.
In a recent study of colonoscopy practice in the United Kingdom, a single policy on bowel preparation was used in 82% of the gastroenterology centres, and sodium phosphate was the preferred agent in 15% of these units.3 However, once incorporated as the standard lavage regimen in units' protocols, the blanket use of sodium phosphate may result in a greater chance of serious complications because pharmaceutical warnings may not be rigidly observed. We present the case of a life threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate before colonoscopy.
Case report
A 64 year old man with Wegener's granulomatosis who attends for routine hospital haemodialysis presented for his routine dialysis with a 24 hour history of tetany, including locked jaw and carpopedal spasm. He also described skin paraesthesia …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27