Size of the needle for infant vaccination

BMJ 2006; 333 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38971.485683.AB (Published 14 September 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;333:563

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Richard Kent Zimmerman (zimmer@pitt.edu), professor
  1. Department of Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15261

    Longer needles reduce incidence of local reactions

    Vaccine safety is a contentious issue, and parental concern continues.1 An online survey (Harris Poll) in 2004 showed that half of parents are concerned that a child might develop a long term medical condition as a result of vaccination, and 10% are “uncomfortable” having their child vaccinated owing to “health reasons.”2 These parental concerns may be fuelled by the increasing number of websites making serious allegations about vaccine safety.3

    Independent bodies—for example, the US Institute of Medicine—have reviewed the evidence for several vaccines and have generally found them to be safe, albeit with rare risks such as anaphylaxis.4 However, local reactions to vaccines are common—ranging from 6% to 50%, depending on the vaccine, definition of local reaction, and dose number in a series—and this can contribute to the safety concerns expressed by parents. Local reactions can be reduced either by using less reactogenic vaccines, such as …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL