- Kalyan Kumar Gangopadhyay (jaykal69@hotmail.com), specialist registrar in diabetes and endocrinology1,
- Francis Sundram, specialist registrar2,
- Parijat De, consultant in medicine, diabetes, and endocrinology1
- 1 Department of Medicine, Diabetes, and Endocrinology, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH,
- 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham
- Correspondence to: K K Gangopadhyay, 87 Thorncroft Way, Walsall WS5 4EF
- Accepted 7 March 2006
Increasing numbers of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures involving radioisotopes are being conducted. The most common procedures include thallium scans for myocardial perfusion, ventilation perfusion lung scans, bone scans, iodine uptake scans, and radioactive iodine as treatment for thyroid disorders. For thyrotoxicosis, for example, 10 000 patients received radioactive iodine (131I) treatment in one year in the United Kingdom alone.1
Such procedures make patients temporarily radioactive and can be an important cause of false alarms at airports by activating radiation detectors. Doctors show a worrying lack of awareness about such potential problems. As a result, patients receiving radioactive isotopes for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes are not adequately warned about persisting radioactivity and precautions that need to be taken.2 We report a case that further highlights this problem.
Case report
A 46 year old man was referred to our endocrine clinic in July 2003 with a history of weight loss, sweating, and diarrhoea. On examination he was sweaty and had a fine tremor. His pulse rate was 96 beats/min. He had no goitre. Investigations showed a free T4 of 93 pmol/l (range 10-24 pmol/l), free T3 of 30 pmol/l (3.5-6.5 pmol/l), and suppressed thyroid stimulating hormone(0.02 mU/l (0.5-5.0 mU/l)). He …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012