Editorials

The diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1463 (Published 22 June 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1463
  1. Brent Graham, director University of Toronto/University Health Network Hand Program (Brent.Graham@uhn.on.ca)
  1. Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada

    Surgery—whether open or closed—works, but only if the diagnosis is right

    The randomised controlled trial of Atroshi and colleagues (p 1473) in this week's BMJ shows that there are no substantive differences in the outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome treated with either a conventional open decompression of the median nerve or an endoscopic approach.1 Their findings confirm those of earlier studies which also found no fundamental difference in outcome that could be attributed to the technique of surgical release of the carpal tunnel.24

    Given that the result of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome is not universally successful, however, what other factors might have an important impact on the outcome? One key determinant is probably the accuracy of the diagnosis.5 6 When …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe