During the writing, rewriting, and editing of this research paper by Helen Truby and colleagues (BMJ 2006;332:1309-11, 3 June), some small errors crept into table 3 of the full version on bmj.com (table 2 of the print version). In the control group the mean (SD) fall in cholesterol during 2-6 months should be 0.24 (0.6) (not 0.24 (0.24) as written) and during 0-6 months should be 0.18 (0.5) (not 0.5 (0.18)). The table footnote should have stated that the fall in total cholesterol at 2 months in the Weight Watchers, Rosemary Conley, and Slim-Fast groups was significantly different from that in the control group. However, the text is correct in explaining these differences, and the conclusions drawn are not affected by the errors.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27