The authors of this paper, Bernard Laumon and colleagues (BMJ 2005;331:1371-4), have alerted us to some wrong values in two of the tables in the full version (see bmj.com). In table 1 the correct values for Friday and Saturday night respectively are: all drivers, 532 (5.4%) and 649 (6.6%); positive for cannabis, 67 (9.8%) and 92 (13.5%); and positive for alcohol, 259 (12.4%) and 355 (16.9%). In table 4 the correct values for Friday and Saturday night respectively are: cases, 410 (6.1%) and 523 (7.7%); controls, 122 (4.1%) and 126 (4.2%). The authors confirm that these changes do not affect the conclusions of the paper.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012