The authors of this paper, Bernard Laumon and colleagues (BMJ 2005;331:1371-4), have alerted us to some wrong values in two of the tables in the full version (see bmj.com). In table 1 the correct values for Friday and Saturday night respectively are: all drivers, 532 (5.4%) and 649 (6.6%); positive for cannabis, 67 (9.8%) and 92 (13.5%); and positive for alcohol, 259 (12.4%) and 355 (16.9%). In table 4 the correct values for Friday and Saturday night respectively are: cases, 410 (6.1%) and 523 (7.7%); controls, 122 (4.1%) and 126 (4.2%). The authors confirm that these changes do not affect the conclusions of the paper.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27