- Balaji Ravichandran
- BMJ
Richard Dawkins is a zoologist—an ethologist, to be precise—who tries to understand animal behaviour. He is also the first professor of public understanding of science at Oxford University, a position he has held since 1995. He wants to inspire people to see the poetry in science, the way Carl Sagan did, and sees his opposition to religion as an integral part of his job.

I visited him at his home in Oxford to learn more about his work in promoting public understanding of science, to understand his views on biomedical issues, and to discover why he is so opposed to the influence of religion on society.
“Doctors, in my opinion, are a bit undereducated in Darwinism,” he lamented, when I told him that I was a medical student working for the BMJ.
He doesn't suggest that doctors should study comparative anatomy or evolution. But he thinks they should take some time to reflect on the problems posed by diseases in an evolutionary perspective.
“For example, lower back pain can be viewed as a fundamentally four legged musculoskeletal system trying to cope with having recently become bipedal.” Similarly, developing some of the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27