How should we rate research?: Pedigree: paternity and progenyBMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7551.1215-a (Published 18 May 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1215
- Woody Caan (email@example.com), professor of public health
- Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ
EDITOR—What is meant by quality in health research?1 2 For social scientists, the Economic and Social Research Council detailed multiple problems with American metrics.3 It introduced the concept of esteem: something dynamic and cumulative (not just sitting on public committees). Pondering what is admirable, I propose two assessments, both stemming from encountering the health scientist I most “esteemed”: Peter Medawar.4 These same qualities were …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial