How should we rate research?: Pedigree: paternity and progeny

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7551.1215-a (Published 18 May 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1215.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Woody Caan (a.w.caan@anglia.ac.uk), professor of public health
  1. Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ

    EDITOR—What is meant by quality in health research?1 2 For social scientists, the Economic and Social Research Council detailed multiple problems with American metrics.3 It introduced the concept of esteem: something dynamic and cumulative (not just sitting on public committees). Pondering what is admirable, I propose two assessments, both stemming from encountering the health scientist I most “esteemed”: Peter Medawar.4 These same qualities were …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL