- Jacqueline Morris, chair, British Geriatrics Society Policy Committee (Jacqeline.Morris@ukgateway.net),
- David Beaumont, honorary secretary, British Geriatrics Society,
- David Oliver, deputy honorary secretary, British Geriatrics Society
- St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX
- Institute of Health Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG1 5AN
Our population is ageing. The need to pay for decent care for older people becomes more pressing, and last month's Wanless report recommended how to provide long term care fairly.1 But what is decent care? The national standards for the health, treatment, and social care of older people in England—set in 2001 in the national service framework (NSF) for older people—provide a good grounding. Last week the UK national director for older people, Professor Ian Philp, presented the next steps for the framework in the report A New Ambition for Old Age, which examined how the framework is being implemented and announced new aims and targets.2
The national service framework for older people set out eight standards to improve the experiences of older people and their carers who are using health, social care, and other services (box 1). A standard on medicines management followed later. Last week's report added a further 10 programmes for implementing the framework, under three important and timely themes: dignity in care, joined up care, and healthy ageing.
Box 1: National service framework for older people
Standards are focused on
Rooting out age discrimination
Promoting person centred care (including a single assessment process for care records)
Intermediate care
General hospital care
Stroke services
Falls services
Mental health in older people
Promoting health and active life in old age
What has improved since the framework was launched five years ago? A third of older people needing intensive daily help in England now receive this in their own homes rather than in residential care; delayed discharge from acute hospitals has been reduced by more than two thirds; …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012