Will UK Biobank pay off?

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1052-i (Published 4 May 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:1052.9

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Geoff Watts
  1. London

    UK Biobank has been promised £61m funding to collect data about genetic and environmental factors that affect human health and disease. But how exactly these data will be exploited is still uncertain, as Geoff Watts reports

    Although the funders of biomedical research are occasionally prepared to undertake modest acts of faith, the promise of a wholly immodest £61m (€88; $111m) points to belief verging on certainty. The funders in this case are the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, and the Department of Health. And the fortunate recipient of their largesse is UK Biobank. Launched in March, this ambitious project continues to generate controversy.

    Previous prospective studies of health and disease have been designed to assess the contributions of environment, behaviour, and family history. But from the outset UK Biobank was to be different—more subjects, more conditions, and an intention to exploit recent insights into the human genome.

    Commentators agree that the United Kingdom, with its vast pool of accessible health service records, is the ideal setting for such a study. UK Biobank will recruit and follow up 500 000 …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL