Creative destruction in the NHS

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7548.984 (Published 27 April 2006)
Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:984

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Chris Ham (c.j.ham@bham.ac.uk), professor of health policy and management
  1. University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT

    The prime minister gambles that more pain will result in greater gain

    When the prime minister makes two major interventions in the NHS in the space of a week, it is a sure sign that the problems of the NHS have reached the top of the government's agenda. In the second of these interventions, a speech to the New Health Network Clinician Forum, Tony Blair rehearsed the progress made in improving the performance of the NHS and argued that a “crunch point” had been reached in its reform.

    The crunch point has arisen, in his words, as part of the transition from the application of “necessarily crude and blunt instruments of centralised performance management and targets” to the use of market-like incentives “to make reform self sustaining.”1 In recognition of the challenges involved in making this transition, the prime minister's message was that he and his government intend to hold their nerve and see the process of change through, even if this means bearing the short term political costs.

    To many NHS staff struggling to deal with financial deficits and to implement …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL