- Myfanwy Davies, research fellow1,
- Glyn Elwyn, research professor (elwyng@Cardiff.ac.uk)1
- 1 Department of General Practice, Centre for Health Sciences Research, Cardiff University, Heath Park CF14 4YS
- Correspondence to: G Elwyn
- Accepted 24 January 2006
As demand for health care outstrips supply, interest is increasing in how to manage the referral of patients by one practitioner to another for further care.1 2 Most complex health systems have considered strategies to manage demand. These initiatives began in healthcare services that provide the first point of contact for patients and entail telephone help lines, computer based decision support systems, and practitioner-led triage systems.3 Similar concepts are being developed at the interface between primary and secondary care: one such initiative is a concept known as referral management centres—a centralised process of managing referrals. Despite a lack of evidence about appropriate referrals rates4 5 and the value of such quality improvement initiatives,6 these centres seem to be expected to influence both the volume and quality of requests. Is this realistic?
Why manage referrals?
Many healthcare systems such as those in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and some health maintenance organisations in the United States use gatekeepers to regulate the flow of referrals from generalists to more specialised colleagues. Interest in managing demand arose in the US during the mid-1990s as health providers tried to curtail costs.7 Despite these origins, an important facet of managing demand is to encourage referrals to services that are both underused and cost effective.8 The accepted definitions recognise that management is equally concerned with creating and coping with demand as well as curtailing inappropriate flows.
Nevertheless, many initiatives seem to have an emphasis on reducing referrals.9 Referral management centres seem to have been largely set up to monitor the flow of referrals from generalists to specialists and often state that their prime aim …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27