This article has a correction
Please see: Vaccines against cervical cancer provoke US controversy
- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- New York
Two vaccines to prevent cervical cancer are nearing approval in the United States and Europe, but they are causing controversy because they are recommended for use in children aged 11 or 12, before they begin sexual activity, Dr Robert Steinbrook, a national correspondent of the New England Journal of Medicine said in a recent edition of the journal (2006;354: 1109-12).
Conservative groups in the US say that use of the vaccine would encourage young people to be promiscuous. The Family Research Council, which earlier said that adolescents should be getting a message about abstinence, later said that it would support use of the vaccines but would oppose efforts to make vaccination mandatory …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27