PDF
Easy Read- Data supplement
Respond to this article- Versions
- bmj.38798.680185.47v1
- 332/7544/739 most recent
- Eric Brunner, reader in epidemiology and public health (e.brunner@ucl.ac.uk)
- UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London WC1E 6BT
Seventy five years ago, long chain omega 3 fatty acids were added to the list of essential nutrients. Later in the 20th century, the properties of marine polyunsaturated oils were linked with several health benefits, including protection from cardiovascular disease. However, a high quality systematic review published in this week's BMJ draws attention to uncertainties about some of the health benefits attributed to omega 3 fats.1
The review shows that the evidence for a reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality is less conclusive than we believed. A previous meta-analysis indicates that mortality is reduced owing to fewer fatal coronary events among people ingesting omega 3 fatty acids,2 but the current review found no strong evidence of a reduction in combined cardiovascular events. The claim that omega 3 fats reduce the risk of cancer is not supported here or by another recent systematic review.3 For each health outcome there are too few trials with adequate allocation concealment, and too few cohort …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27