What sort of evidence do we need in primary care?
BMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7542.619 (Published 16 March 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:619- Sharon Mickan, senior research fellow in general practice (Sharon.Mickan@gmail.com),
- Deborah Askew, postdoctoral research fellow, School of Medicine
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
General practitioners need evidence from and about the patients they see
In this week's BMJ (p 635), Mant and colleagues raise again the question of whether large scale randomised controlled trials provide evidence relevant to primary care.1 In a cross sectional study they question whether the UK national clinical guidelines for stroke are applicable to primary care patients. These guidelines, largely based on the PROGRESS trial,1 recommend a target blood pressure of 140/85 mm Hg, with further lowering beyond this target desirable through use of a thiazide diuretic and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.2
Mant and colleagues critiqued the applicability of these guidelines to primary care patients by comparing the characteristics of patients in English general practice who had confirmed stroke with participants in the PROGRESS trial. They concluded that these populations were not sufficiently similar to warrant widespread use …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.