NEJM stands by its criticism of Vioxx study

doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7540.505-a

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ news articles:

From

The BMJ iPad app brings you the best of print and online, including live links to the latest news, blogs, video, and podcasts. Get the BMJ iPad app.
Countdown to London 2012: BMJ Group's Olympics portal highlights latest Olympics and sports medicine-themed research, comment and learning
Keep up to date with cardiology: Access the latest cardiovascular medicine resources from across BMJ Group.
Our online table of contents is updated at least twice each day. Read all articles published in the last 7 days.
OPEN ACCESS: All research articles are freely available online, with no word limit. Find out more about the BMJ's open access policy. Submit your paper.

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Janice Hopkins Tanne

New York

The New England Journal of Medicine last week reaffirmed the expression of concern that it made last December, about the omission of three heart attacks from a study of rofecoxib (Vioxx) published in 2000. The online editorial was published on 22 February 2006 (http://content.nejm.org, doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068054).

The journal also published responses from 11 authors of the study who are not employed by Merck, the drug's manufacturer, and from two authors who are (doi: 10.1056/NEJMc066096).

The controversy concerns the VIGOR (Vioxx gastrointestinal outcomes research) study, which compared upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib with naproxen and was published in the journal in 2000 (New England Journal of Medicine 2000;343: 1520-8).

Last year, the journal editors reviewed electronic documents relating to the study when the journal's executive …