- Alison Tonks (atonks@bmj.com), associate editor
Cognitive performance is rock bottom just after waking
Sleep deprivation is bad for performance, but being woken up is worse. In a laboratory experiment, adult volunteers performing a series of random adding tests scored lower in the three minutes after waking than they did at any time over the next 24 hours. One minute after waking, their scores were only 65% of their best, significantly worse than all other test scores during the experiment, including the test done after a whole night without sleep (P ≤ 0.01). After 20-60 minutes awake, the volunteers had bounced back to over 80% of their peak performance.
Credit JAMA
The experiment was small but carefully done. The nine healthy volunteers had no caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, or drugs (recreational or medicinal) for three weeks before the study. For the same period they logged a regular eight hours' sleep every night.
The results suggest that cognitive performance is worst just after waking, which has obvious implications for on-call doctors, truck drivers, soldiers, and others who are woken from sleep to do complex tasks more or less immediately.
Simple strategy for diagnosing pulmonary embolism looks safe
Diagnosing pulmonary embolism can be a complicated, multistage process. In an attempt to simplify it, Dutch doctors developed a new more straightforward approach. Firstly, decide whether pulmonary embolism is likely or unlikely using a simplified version of the Well's rule. If pulmonary embolism is unlikely, do a d-dimer test. If that's negative, withhold anticoagulants. For everyone else, go straight for computed tomography and rely on the results to make a treatment decision.
It seems to work. In a large trial of 3306 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, treatment was withheld from 1028 who were classed as “unlikely” to have embolism and had a negative d-dimer test result. Over the next three months, only five of them (0.5%, 95% CI 0.2% to 1.1%) developed venous thromboembolism. Treatment was …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012