A mix-up during submission led to the wrong version of table 3 being included in the full version of this paper (see bmj.com) by Chantal M Morel and colleagues (BMJ 2005;331:1299-302, 3 Dec). The R0 value for case management with chloroquine should be 0.35 (rather than 0.3). The adherence for artemisinin based combination treatment should be 35% (not 40%), and neither that nor the adherence for non-artemisinin based treatment needs a footnote. Values for probability of success when patients were not fully compliant should be 35% for non-artemisinin based treatment and 0% for intermittent presumptive treatment during pregnancy (rather than 35% and 10% respectively, as given). These revised values also apply to table B on bmj.com.
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Darwin’s illness revisited
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (6 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012