A mix-up during submission led to the wrong version of table 3 being included in the full version of this paper (see bmj.com) by Chantal M Morel and colleagues (BMJ 2005;331:1299-302, 3 Dec). The R0 value for case management with chloroquine should be 0.35 (rather than 0.3). The adherence for artemisinin based combination treatment should be 35% (not 40%), and neither that nor the adherence for non-artemisinin based treatment needs a footnote. Values for probability of success when patients were not fully compliant should be 35% for non-artemisinin based treatment and 0% for intermittent presumptive treatment during pregnancy (rather than 35% and 10% respectively, as given). These revised values also apply to table B on bmj.com.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27