- Mark Schiffman, senior investigator (schiffmm@mail.nih.gov),
- Philip E Castle, investigator
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Increased understanding of human papilloma-viruses (HPV) and cervical carcinogenesis has led to prevention strategies that are very promising. Two articles in this issue (pp 79, 83) find that DNA testing for HPV is a cost effective way to clarify the meaning of equivocal results of cervical cytology.1 2
Cervical HPV infections are very common, particularly among young women, and are sexually transmitted.3 They usually clear within one or two years. However, persistent infections by 15 or so carcinogenic HPV genotypes cause most cases of cervical precancer, which is generally diagnosed years after the causal infection, and of invasive cancer, which is typically diagnosed at least two decades after infection.4
Reproducible methods for testing for HPV are already available that are more sensitive (but less specific) than cytology for detecting prevalent and incipient precancer and cancer.5 Testing for HPV might be used to improve the four sequential steps of programmes for preventing cervical cancer: population screening, triaging equivocally abnormal cytology, diagnosing women with abnormal results linked to deciding when to treat, and assuring cure after treatment. Until recently, the standard model for prevention was based on …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012