- Marianne M Lill, medical student1,
- Tim J Wilkinson (tim.wilkinson{at}chmeds.ac.nz), associate professor1
- Correspondence to: Dr Tim Wilkinson, Princess Margaret Hospital, PO Box 800, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Accepted 30 September 2005
Abstract
Objective To document patients' preferred dress styles of their doctors and modes of address.
Design Descriptive survey.
Setting Inpatients and outpatients at a tertiary level hospital, New Zealand.
Participants 202 inpatients and 249 outpatients, mean age 55.9 (SD 19.3) years.
Main outcome measures Ranking of patients' opinions of photographs showing doctors wearing different dress styles. A five point Likert scale was used to measure patient comfort with particular items of appearance.
Results Patients preferred doctors to wear semiformal attire, but the addition of a smiling face was even better. The next most preferred styles were semiformal without a smile, followed by white coat, formal suit, jeans, and casual dress. Patients were more comfortable with conservative items of clothing, such as long sleeves, covered shoes, and dress trousers or skirts than with less conservative items such as facial piercing, short tops, and earrings on men. Many less conservative items such as jeans were still acceptable to most patients. Most patients preferred to be called by their first name, to be introduced to a doctor by full name and title, and to see the doctor's name badge worn at the breast pocket. Older patients had more conservative preferences.
Conclusions Patients prefer doctors to wear semiformal dress and are most comfortable with conservative items; many less conservative items were, however, acceptable. A smile made a big difference.
Footnotes
-
Contributors Both authors were involved in the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the results, and in writing the paper. ML undertook the data collection. She is guarantor.
-
Funding Summer studentship grant of $NZ5000 from the Medical Council of New Zealand.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Ethical approval This study was approved by the Canterbury ethics committee.
- Accepted 30 September 2005
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012