Judging a book by its cover: descriptive survey of patients' preferences for doctors' appearance and mode of address

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1524 (Published 22 December 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1524

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Marianne M Lill, medical student1,
  2. Tim J Wilkinson (tim.wilkinson{at}chmeds.ac.nz), associate professor1
  1. 1Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Tim Wilkinson, Princess Margaret Hospital, PO Box 800, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Accepted 30 September 2005

Abstract

Objective To document patients' preferred dress styles of their doctors and modes of address.

Design Descriptive survey.

Setting Inpatients and outpatients at a tertiary level hospital, New Zealand.

Participants 202 inpatients and 249 outpatients, mean age 55.9 (SD 19.3) years.

Main outcome measures Ranking of patients' opinions of photographs showing doctors wearing different dress styles. A five point Likert scale was used to measure patient comfort with particular items of appearance.

Results Patients preferred doctors to wear semiformal attire, but the addition of a smiling face was even better. The next most preferred styles were semiformal without a smile, followed by white coat, formal suit, jeans, and casual dress. Patients were more comfortable with conservative items of clothing, such as long sleeves, covered shoes, and dress trousers or skirts than with less conservative items such as facial piercing, short tops, and earrings on men. Many less conservative items such as jeans were still acceptable to most patients. Most patients preferred to be called by their first name, to be introduced to a doctor by full name and title, and to see the doctor's name badge worn at the breast pocket. Older patients had more conservative preferences.

Conclusions Patients prefer doctors to wear semiformal dress and are most comfortable with conservative items; many less conservative items were, however, acceptable. A smile made a big difference.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors were involved in the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the results, and in writing the paper. ML undertook the data collection. She is guarantor.

  • Funding Summer studentship grant of $NZ5000 from the Medical Council of New Zealand.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval This study was approved by the Canterbury ethics committee.

  • Accepted 30 September 2005
Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

THIS WEEK'S POLL