Choice

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1488 (Published 22 December 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1488

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Paul Bate, chair of health services management (s.p.bate@chime.ucl.ac.uk),
  2. Glenn Robert, senior research fellow
  1. Royal Free and University College Medical School, London N19 5LW

    More can mean less

    For the NHS, 2006 might well be the year of choice. The UK government's plans for “empowering patients to play a bigger role in choosing where and who provides them with their health service” are finally to become reality.1 2 These plans will be supported by the twin pillars of competition, and plurality of provision. To be pro-choice is clearly to be on the side of the angels, or at least the politicians. Spare a thought this Christmas, therefore, for a small group of people who insist there is another side to the argument.

    In a recent bestselling business book, psychologist Barry Schwartz argues that the amount of choice on offer in life exceeds our ability to effectively exercise that choice, or even to enjoy it.3 The debilitating effects of choice overload may be bewilderment and high levels of anxiety and stress. When a brush with illness in the United States caused health …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL