- Iona Heath, general practitioner (iona.heath@dsl.pipex.com)1,
- Kieran Sweeney, honorary clinical senior lecturer in general practice2
- 1 Caversham Group Practice, London NW5 2UP
- 2 Peninsula Medical School, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter EX2 5DW
- Correspondence to: I Heath
Introduction
Despite enormous advances within medical science over the past 100 years, an under-recognised but inevitable gap remains between the map of medical science and the territory of individual human suffering.1 The task of the medical generalist is to make useful connections across this constantly recurring gap. All doctors carry the medical map, albeit with patchy and varying levels of detail, but only the medical generalist uses it to try and make sense of the whole human person, transcending all the arbitrary divisions of specialist practice. Here we explore the role of the medical generalist and consider how this might be affected by current NHS reforms.
Generalist's role
In the initial consultation with a general practitioner, doctor and patient work together to explore the usefulness and the limitations of the medical map in relation to the territory (or subjective experience) of the patient's particular illness. When the patient has an acute and remediable illness or accident, attention will be mostly on the map, but when the patient is dying the attention will revert almost entirely on to the territory.2 In chronic illness, a careful balance must be achieved and maintained so that neither aspect is neglected.
To work effectively in this context, the medical generalist must maintain a clear understanding of both borders of the gap. This requires a thorough, robust, and continuously updated knowledge of medical science; an empathic willingness to recognise, acknowledge, and witness the true extent of suffering; and an appreciation of the details of individual lives, combined with a respect for the history, aspirations, and values which have made those lives what they have become.
Centrality of medical diagnosis
General practitioners operate in a low tech environment, where, until recently, the most sophisticated instruments …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Hormone replacement therapy - psychiatric aspects
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt?
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt?
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Improving the delivery of safe and effective healthcare in low and middle income countries
Published 22 February 2012
Most responses
Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt? (12 responses)
Published 15 Feb 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Raised inflammatory markers (7 responses)
Published 3 Feb 2012
Independence in disciplinary proceedings against doctors (5 responses)
Published 24 Jan 2012