This article has a correction
Please see: Primary care in the United States: problems and possibilities
- Robert L Phillips, assistant director (bphillips@aafp.org)1
- 1Robert Graham Center, 1350 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington DC, 20036 USA
The UK government is hoping to improve primary care through competition. But US experience shows the difficulties created by a system reliant on market forces
Introduction
The United States has never had a more robust primary care workforce, but dysfunctional financing schemes and inability to compete for the hearts and minds of the next generation of young doctors threaten its future. Many of the problems are a direct result of the market approach to health care. Innovation is needed in how primary care functions are financed, protected, organised, and taught in order to identify options for a stable and robust health system built on primary care.
The US undervalues family doctors
US primary care
Primary medical care in the US is delivered by three specialties: family medicine, general internal medicine, and general paediatrics. The specialties have a combined workforce of 222 000 doctors, whose primary function is to direct patient care. There is at least one doctor for every 1321 people in the US (table).1 In addition, more than 100 000 nurse practitioners and physician assistants work in primary care.1 Together, their offices serve as the medical home for most Americans and receive more visits than any other setting.2 It is concerning then that many recent publications have concluded that these specialties and the way they currently care for people is untenable.3 4 These publications show that people in the US are confused about the primary care specialties, sceptical about their claim to deliver comprehensive care, and unable to associate primary care with science or technology. They also indicate that the generalist specialties suffer from a lack of respect in academic circles, administrative burdens, and inflexible appointment schedules and brief visits that satisfy neither patient nor provider.
- In this window
- In a new window
Distribution of doctors in United States, 2004
The hospitalist movement, which continues to …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27