- Chris Ham (c.j.ham@bham.ac.uk), professor
- 1Health Service Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT
Increased patient choice and a bigger role for the independent sector threaten the future of district general hospitals. As the public remains firmly attached to these hospitals, a managed transition represents a huge political challenge
Introduction
It was in 1962 that Enoch Powell, then minister of health, published the Hospital Plan for England and Wales.1 The plan served as a framework for the development of hospital services in the decades that followed, leading to the building of many new hospitals and the refurbishment of others. At the heart of this framework was the district general hospital, designed to provide a comprehensive range of inpatient and outpatient services to populations of 100 000 to 150 000. District general hospitals have formed the backbone of NHS hospital care ever since.
Today, many of these hospitals face an uncertain future. The uncertainty has arisen as a result of advances in healthcare technology enabling more specialist services to be provided outside the hospital, changes in the workforce (particularly a reduction in the hours worked by doctors in training), evidence that some services are better concentrated in fewer centres able to achieve superior outcomes, and government policies designed to increase patient choice and stimulate greater efficiency in the use of resources. Here, I focus on the effect of government policies.
Market reforms
The over-riding objective of health policy since the election of the Labour government in 1997 has been reducing waiting lists and waiting times for treatment. In pursuit of this objective, the government has procured extra treatment capacity and introduced reforms to increase patient choice. These reforms include a new approach to funding hospitals, payment by results, under which money will follow patients to the hospitals of their choice. Patient choice and payment by results create the conditions in which hospitals will compete with each …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012