Clinical Review Lessons of the week

Acute crystal arthritis mimicking infection after total knee arthroplasty

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7528.1322 (Published 01 December 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1322
  1. G Holt (graemeholt@btinternet.com), specialist registrar1,
  2. C Vass, senior house officer1,
  3. C S Kumar, consultant1
  1. 1Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF
  1. Correspondence to: G Holt
  • Accepted 29 April 2005

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty is the most effective treatment to relieve the pain associated with end stage arthritis of the knee.1 A reported 0.5-2% of people will develop sepsis of the implant, necessitating lavage and debridement of the affected knee with immediate or delayed removal of the implant.2 3 The key to successful management of implant sepsis is early and accurate diagnosis, which allows prompt treatment. Every patient with pain and swelling at the site of a total knee arthroplasty must, therefore, be assessed for infection.1 We report a case of a patient initially diagnosed as having implant sepsis who in fact had pseudogout of the knee. This shows the diagnostic difficulties and issues surrounding management that may arise when a patient presents with crystal arthritis at the site of previous joint replacement.

Case report

A previously well 72 year old man presented with a three day history of progressive swelling of the left knee with associated pain, erythema of the skin, tachycardia, and a fever of 38.8°C. Two years before, the patient had had primary total knee arthroplasty surgery of the affected joint for a …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe