Clinical Review

ABC of health informatics

Improving services with informatics tools

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1190 (Published 17 November 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1190

This article has a correction

Please see: ABC of health informatics: Improving services with informatics tools

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Frank Sullivan, NHS Tayside professor of research and development in general practice and primary care,
  2. Jeremy C Wyatt, professor of health informatics
  1. University of Dundee

    Introduction

    This article describes how many sources of data can be linked, interpreted, and analysed before being presented to decision makers to improve care. It also discusses the legal issues surrounding data protection and freedom of information.

    A huge volume of data flows across the desk of a director of public health (see box opposite). One of the director's problems is to know which signals to act upon and what “noise” to ignore. If the numbers being considered are small, as they probably will be in the case described here, a critical incident analysis may be all that is needed. An individual prescriber, or group, may have an erroneous belief or inadequate training. Critical incidents or other signals often indicate that more data (such as data on prescribing steroids for paediatric asthma in primary care and outpatients) are needed.

    Sources of data


    Embedded Image

    Health services are awash with data. Earlier articles in the series described the large and increasing numbers of sources of data available to consumers, patients, clinicians, and administrators. Clinicians, teams, divisions, and other groups collect the data they need to carry out their work, and they may do so using coding and terms that others can understand and share. The intensive care unit in this example integrated the data the team needs to manage patients during their stay with patients' pre-admission prescribing data. This local epidemiology may have been done as part of clinical governance activities, or as an ad hoc exercise when a patient's problem was investigated.

    One difficulty with secondary uses of clinical data is that, having obtained the data indicating a problem exists, the issue must be dealt with effectively. It may be that the individual or group who identify the problem have the knowledge, skills, and resources to resolve it. In other cases, such as these potentially …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular