Reviews Press Why can't the Daily Mail eat humble pie over MMR? BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1148 (Published 10 November 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1148 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles News Roundup [abridged Versions Appear In The Paper Journal] High Court judge criticises Andrew Wakefield for trying to silence his critics Published: 10 November 2005; BMJ 331 doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1104-a Review Hit parade Published: 15 December 2005; BMJ 331 doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7530.1481-b See more Institutional research misconduct BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d7284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7284 Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddle BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6823 Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitis BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6979 Commentary: I see no convincing evidence of “enterocolitis,” “colitis,” or a “unique disease process” BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6985; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6985 Is research safe in their hands? BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284 Cited by... The Daily Mails U turn on MMR vaccinationFulltext PDF Hit paradeFulltext PDF
