Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort studyBMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38629.587639.7C (Published 10 November 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1113
- Jason Gardosi, director ()1,
- Sue M Kady, perinatal research fellow1,
- Pat McGeown, head of midwifery1,
- Andre Francis, statistician1,
- Ann Tonks, data analyst1
- Correspondence to: J Gardosi
- Accepted 16 September 2005
Objective To develop and test a new classification system for stillbirths to help improve understanding of the main causes and conditions associated with fetal death.
Design Population based cohort study.
Setting West Midlands region.
Subjects 2625 stillbirths from 1997 to 2003.
Main outcome measures Categories of death according to conventional classification methods and a newly developed system (ReCoDe, relevant condition at death).
Results By the conventional Wigglesworth classification, 66.2% of the stillbirths (1738 of 2625) were unexplained. The median gestational age of the unexplained group was 237 days, significantly higher than the stillbirths in the other categories (210 days; P < 0.001). The proportion of stillbirths that were unexplained was high regardless of whether a postmortem examination had been carried out or not (67% and 65%; P = 0.3). By the ReCoDe classification, the most common condition was fetal growth restriction (43.0%), and only 15.2% of stillbirths remained unexplained. ReCoDe identified 57.7% of the Wigglesworth unexplained stillbirths as growth restricted. The size of the category for intrapartum asphyxia was reduced from 11.7% (Wigglesworth) to 3.4% (ReCoDe).
Conclusion The new ReCoDe classification system reduces the predominance of stillbirths currently categorised as unexplained. Fetal growth restriction is a common antecedent of stillbirth, but its high prevalence is hidden by current classification systems. This finding has profound implications for maternity services, and raises the question whether some hitherto “unexplained” stillbirths may be avoidable.
Stillbirths are the largest contributor to perinatal mortality, but current classification systems consistently report about two thirds of stillbirths as being unexplained.1 The preponderance of fetal deaths ending up in a non-specific or unexplained category occurs despite the use of three classification methods: the pathophysiological classification by Wigglesworth,2 the fetal and neonatal classification,3 and the revised obstetric (Aberdeen) classification.4
Any classification system that results in such a high proportion of cases being defined as unexplained would seem not to be fulfilling its purpose, which is to help clinicians to understand what went wrong and to derive learning points for best clinical practice; to assist in counselling bereaved mothers and families about the loss, the underlying reasons, and prospects for the future; and to aid public health specialists and commissioners to prioritise health service resources and strategies for prevention.
We developed a classification system for defining relevant clinical categories for stillbirth and we tested the method on a dataset of stillbirths in the West Midlands over a period of seven years.
The data for our study were derived from rapid report forms submitted to the Perinatal Institute from all maternity units in the West Midlands. We analysed data on all stillbirths occurring in the West Midlands population between 1997 and 2003. Data included the date of delivery, gestational age, maternal characteristics, the baby's sex and birth weight, and pregnancy details to ascertain the cause of death, including results of any postmortem examination. The forms list the primary and sometimes secondary causes, which are used to code the relevant classifications. We obtained the denominators (all stillbirths and live births) from the Office for National Statistics.
Our new classification system (box) seeks to identify the relevant condition at the time of death in utero. (See bmj.com for the principles on which the system is based.) The system seeks to establish what went wrong, not necessarily why (as the classification does not have to rely on finding an underlying cause, more than one category can be coded if the information is available). The hierarchy starts from conditions affecting the fetus and moves outwards in simple anatomical groups, which are subdivided into pathophysiological conditions; the primary condition should be the first on the list that is applicable to a case.
Fetal growth restriction is included as the last category in group A (A7): a fetus below the 10th customised centile would be assigned this classification only if none of the other specific fetal conditions were present. Secondary coding can be used to increase descriptiveness while maintaining a hierarchy of groups A to I to reflect clinical relevance.
Birth weight for gestation centile
We calculated customised centiles along previously described principles,5 6 using the gestation related optimal weight software GROW, version 4.6 (http://www.gestation.net/), which calculates the fetal growth potential by adjusting for the fetus's sex and constitutional characteristics known at the beginning of each pregnancy: maternal height and weight, parity, and ethnic origin. The actual birth weight is then compared with the optimal weight predicted for the corresponding gestation, and a “customised centile” is calculated. The method improves the distinction between constitutional and pathological smallness for gestational age,7 8 allowing customised smallness for gestational age to be used synonymously with fetal growth restriction. For missing data such as maternal height or weight at booking, population averages were used.
The calculation of the centile required an estimation of gestational age at the time of death. As in previous analyses of stillbirth weight,7 9 we deducted two days from the gestational age at delivery of each stillborn fetus. This is taken as the average estimated time interval in the third trimester between fetal death and delivery.10
Overall, 2625 stillbirths and 451 197 births occurred during the seven year period between 1997 and 2003, representing an average stillbirth rate of 5.82 per 1000.
The table lists the causes of death according to Wigglesworth,2 which is the classification most commonly used for national statistics.1 The largest category, 66.2%, was for unexplained antepartum fetal death, and 11.7% of deaths were associated with intrapartum causes. An equivalent unexplained category was also the largest by the fetal and neonatal classification3 (66.2%) and the revised obstetric (Aberdeen) classification (52.7%).11
Classification system according to relevant condition at death (ReCoDe)
Group A: Fetus
Lethal congenital anomaly
Fetomaternal haemorrhage 6. Twin-twin transfusion 7. Fetal growth restriction*
Group B: Umbilical cord
Constricting loop or knot†
Group C: Placenta
Other “placental insufficiency”‡
Group D: Amniotic fluid
Group E: Uterus
Group F: Mother
Hypertensive diseases in pregnancy
Lupus or antiphospholipid syndrome
Group G: Intrapartum
Group H: Trauma
Group I: Unclassified
No relevant condition identified
No information available
*<10th customised weight for gestational age centile.
†If severe enough to be considered relevant.
The average (median) gestational age at delivery of the stillbirths denoted as unexplained by Wigglesworth was significantly higher than the gestational age of the stillbirths that fell into the other Wigglesworth categories (237 v 210 days; P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U).
A total of 1241 of the 2625 stillbirths (47.3%) had a postmortem examination. The proportion of stillbirths that were unexplained was high regardless of whether a postmortem examination had been carried out or not (810 of 1241 (65.3%) v 928 of 1383 (67.1%); P = 0.3).
The figure shows the results using the ReCoDe classification. Only 398 (15.2%) cases remained unclassified as “no relevant condition identified” (I1). The largest category of stillbirths was A7, fetal growth restriction (43.0%). Of the 1738 unexplained stillbirths according to Wigglesworth (table), the ReCoDe system identified 1002 (57.7%) as growth restricted.
Information on classification of a secondary condition was available on 1146 (43.7%) of the rapid report forms (figure). A wide spread of secondary conditions was observed for several of the primary classifications. In particular, a large proportion of congenital anomalies were also growth restricted; among the primary fetal growth restriction group (A7), the most common secondary codes were placental abruption, oligohydramnios, maternal hypertensive disease, and intrapartum asphyxia; and intrapartum asphyxia was often a secondary code for stillbirth associated with abruptio.
Overall, the ReCoDe system showed a smaller proportion of deaths in the intrapartum group than did Wigglesworth (3.4% v 11.7%). As suggested from the secondary coding analysis (figure), this was because many cases of intrapartum asphyxia were assigned other primary conditions under the ReCoDe system. Fetal growth restriction and placental abruptio together accounted for 99 (63%) of the 156 cases with a secondary coding of intrapartum asphyxia.
What is already known on this topic
Stillbirths are the largest contributor to perinatal mortality
The current method of classifying perinatal deaths results in at least two thirds of stillbirths being classified as unexplained
What this study adds
A new classification system (ReCoDe) can identify relevant conditions at the time of fetal death in 85% of cases
Fetal growth restriction is the single largest category of conditions associated with stillbirth and is found in the majority of the cases previously considered unexplained
This analysis of a seven year regional cohort of stillbirths showed that the new ReCoDe (relevant condition at death) classification enabled 85% of cases of stillbirth to be assigned a relevant condition, leaving only 15% as unclassified or unexplained. On the same data, the conventional Wigglesworth classification left 66% of stillbirths unexplained, which is consistent with the reported national rate of unexplained stillbirth.1 12 This raises doubts as to whether classification systems that leave most stillbirths in an unexplained category still have a place in modern perinatal audit.
The single largest condition associated with stillbirth is failure of fetal growth. Such a link does not become evident when perinatal mortality is presented in separate groupings for weight and gestational age.13 14 Making comparisons within weight categories by controlling for birth weight15 can also obscure the fact that many deaths in utero are of fetuses that are smaller than they should be at that gestational age. Nevertheless, even with conventional classification methods, low birth weight emerges as the single largest category.16
The extent of the link between stillbirth weight and death becomes most apparent when weight is corrected for gestation. Williams et al17 analysed fetal deaths on population based centile curves in California and showed a strong link between fetal weight for gestation and death. Using measures of smallness for gestation within perinatal death classification systems can result in fewer stillbirths in the unexplained category.18 19
Smallness for gestation has a demonstrable link with fetal death at the population level. However, individually each fetus may be either physiologically or pathologically small, and could be inappropriately classified if only weight for gestation is used. Our classification system therefore uses individually adjustable, customised weight centiles to define which babies had fetal growth restriction. Between a quarter and a third of babies considered small for gestational age (< 10th centile) by general population based weight standards are in fact small-normal and have no increased risk of perinatal morbidity or mortality.7 8 A corresponding proportion of babies who should be considered as pathologically small are missed by uncustomised standards, and these have been shown to have an increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality.7 8
The use of customised centiles for weight allows us not only to quantify the overall strength of association between stillbirth and pathological smallness but also to identify in each individual case whether the stillbirth occurred after poor fetal growth. Although not strictly a cause of death, fetal growth restriction is an important condition present at the time of fetal death.
The analysis of secondary codes (figure) provides further insight into the conditions leading to stillbirth. Growth restriction is known to have an association with placental abruption and is shown here to have been often present when the abruptio occurred. Similarly, many instances of intrapartum asphyxia resulting in stillbirth were of babies who were already growth restricted.
The category of deaths due to intrapartum asphyxia was much smaller when classified by the ReCoDe system (3.4%) than by the Wigglesworth classification (11.7%). The intrapartum category turns up more often as a secondary classification (figure). Many of these deaths are identified as having another primary condition such as fetal growth failure, highlighting the importance of this condition as an antecedent of intrapartum death
This is consistent with the emerging consensus of a much more important contribution of antepartum, compared with intrapartum, factors on adverse pregnancy outcomes such as cerebral palsy.20 The finding would support the notion that good intrapartum care begins earlier in pregnancy: the antepartum course affects the fetus's reserve and ability to withstand stress, and is therefore relevant for determining the appropriate level of surveillance during labour.
Most stillbirths occurred at gestation when the baby would be mature enough not only to survive but to do well, if it could be delivered in good condition. This shifts the emphasis on the identification, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth problems. Prospective surveillance can result in the timely delivery of a fetus at risk from an unfavourable intrauterine environment. The main problem facing expectant mothers and clinicians, however, is the lack of recognition within the general maternity population of fetuses with growth problems that are in need of referral for further investigation. In everyday practice, only about a quarter of small for gestational age babies are detected as such antenatally,21 and lack of antenatal detection is considered to be the single largest factor associated with substandard care.1
The strong link between fetal growth failure and stillbirth has important implications for health policies and preventive strategies, including the need to enhance efforts to improve the antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction.
This article was posted on bmj.com on 19 October 2005: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/38629.587639.7C
We thank the West Midlands local coordinators for their consistent efforts in completing rapid report forms on perinatal deaths, and Sarah Badger, Chris Blount, and Donna Drinkall in the Perinatal Institute for coding the data.
Contributors See bmj.com.
Funding NHS West Midlands Regional Levies.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethical approval Not required.