This article has a correction
Please see: Cervical cancer, human papillomavirus, and vaccination
- Catherine M Lowndes, consultant scientist (epidemiology),
- O Noel Gill, consultant epidemiologist (Noel.Gill@hpa.org.uk)
- HIV and STI Department, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London NW9 5EQ
- HIV and STI Department, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London NW9 5EQ
Vaccines work, but we need more information before widespread immunisation
At the beginning of October one of the trials of vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the primary risk factor for cervical cancer, announced an encouraging result.1 Large scale, multi-country, multi-site trials of several HPV vaccines are currently under way. The end points comprise incident and persistent HPV infection (during 2-3 years' follow-up) and associated precancerous cytological and histological lesions (cervical intraepithelial (CIN) neoplasia during 2-3 and 4-5 years'follow-up). The World Health Organization is expecting at least one of these vaccines to be licensed for use in 2006.2 How promising are the available trial results? What other questions need answering? And is it time to accelerate preparations for programmes to provide HPV vaccination?
The latest data release concerns a trial of a quadrivalent recombinant vaccine that included HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18.1 In all, 12 167 women at 90 centres in 13 countries participated in the trial, the FUTURE II study. In this prospective double blind study, women aged 16 to 26 were randomised to receive three doses of either vaccine or placebo over six months.
In a restricted “according to protocol” analysis that included only women who had no protocol violations and who received a full course of vaccine and were free of infection with HPV types 16 and 18 at month 7, the reported efficacy of the vaccine after an average follow-up of 17 months …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012