- Rajeev Srivastava, specialist registrar (rajeev.srivastava@tuht.scot.nhs.uk)1,
- Callum Fraser, consultant biochemist1,
- Douglas Gentleman, consultant2,
- Lynne A Jamieson, specialist registrar3,
- Michael J Murphy, senior lecturer1
- 1Department of Biochemical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
- 2Centre for Brain Injury Rehabilitation, Royal Victoria Hospital, Dundee
- 3Department of Histopathology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
- Correspondence to: R Srivastava
- Accepted 3 May 2005
Introduction
Interpretation of abnormally high serum amylase activity is not always straightforward. Sometimes, as here, patients are erroneously labelled as having pancreatitis despite the absence of clinical features to support this diagnosis. Such assumptions may affect the interpretation of investigations.
Case report
A 53 year old woman was admitted to hospital, initially with a dense hemiparesis and dysarthria because of a left middle cerebral infarct. At the time of admission, she was recovering from a recent myocardial infarction. She was not known to be diabetic.
About six weeks after admission she complained of several episodes of vomiting. Routine haematology and biochemistry investigations were unremarkable apart from serum amylase activity of 1730 U/l (reference interval 0-100 U/l). This result immediately prompted surgical review. The surgical senior house officer diagnosed acute pancreatitis. A few days later the surgical registrar confirmed this clinical impression, although, in the complete absence of abdominal pain, the pancreatitis was described as mild. Multiple repeated measurements of serum amylase activity confirmed a rising trend, reaching as high as 5791 U/l. Abdominal ultrasound examination did not reveal any abnormality, although the pelvic region …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27