Reviews PERSONAL VIEWS

Reforming the NHS in England

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7520.852-a (Published 06 October 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:852
  1. Jennifer Dixon (jdixon@kingsfund.org.uk), director of policy
  1. King's Fund,London

    Some time around 2000 it became evident that the service the NHS provided would not be “transformed” to the extent that the government desired. The model was wrong. In England an impressive clutch of reforms were being implemented, partly set out in the NHS Plan: better regulation; more training, development, and staff; more “change management,” for example through collaborative programmes; more easily accessible guidance on best practice; better information and information technology; and pay modernisation. These would all help, but they would not be enough. Central directives, coupled with strong arm performance management, were highly effective but could be realistically applied only in a limited number of areas, and perverse outcomes were a high risk.

    In short, it was recognised that the NHS could not be effectively run from the centre. And local NHS organisations did not have enough incentives to perform well. Why did it take a national …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe