Letter

Childhood cancer and power lines: What do the data mean?

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.634 (Published 15 September 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:634.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Nick Day, professor of epidemiology (nick.day@srl.cam.ac.uk),
  2. Tim Eden, professor of paediatric oncology,
  3. Patricia McKinney, professor of paediatric epidemiology,
  4. Eve Roman, professor of epidemiology,
  5. Jill Simpson, research fellow
  1. Institute of Public Health, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 8RN
  2. Academic Unit of Paediatric Oncology, Christie Hospital and Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trusts, Manchester M20 4BX
  3. Paediatric Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LN
  4. Epidemiology and Genetics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD

    Editor—Draper et al used distance of mother's home from high voltage overhead transmission lines (predominantly 275 kV and 400 kV) at the time of her child's birth as a proxy for her child's subsequent exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields (reviewed by Ahlbom et al).1 2 As they acknowledge, this is a crude estimate since, in contrast to other reports,2 no household measurements were taken, no data on more prevalent …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular