- John Starr, consultant physician (js011q1400@blueyonder.co.uk)
- University of Edinburgh
Introduction
Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea is a serious condition with a mortality of up to 25% in frail elderly people.1 It affects older, frailer, hospitalised patients and also younger patients who are immunosuppressed.
Cross infection by C difficile is common in neonatal units, but neonates do not seem to develop C difficile associated diarrhoea.
The diagnosis of C difficile associated diarrhoea depends on:
Presence of diarrhoea, defined as an increase in stool liquidity usually accompanied by an increased frequency of bowel motions. A formal cut-off is the passing of more than 300 ml of liquid stool in 24 hours
Detection of toxins produced by C difficile in the stools.
The patient may also experience abdominal pain and have systemic features of malaise, fever, dehydration, and delirium. A pseudomembranous colitis is present in severe cases. In this state there is sloughing of the colonic epithelium, which is severely inflamed due to the cytotoxic action of C difficile.
C difficile associated diarrhoea is classically associated with clindamycin, but it may occur after exposure to a wide range of antibiotics.
Symptoms usually start during antibiotic treatment or shortly afterwards. Symptoms can be delayed by a few weeks, so it is worth asking patients whether they are currently taking, or have recently taken, antibiotics.
How does it happen?
C difficile is spread by the faecal-oral route, albeit indirectly through spores left on surfaces. C difficile is an anaerobic, Gram positive, spore forming bacterium that is the major identifiable cause of antibiotic associated diarrhoea.
The …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012