- Janice Hopkins Tanne
- New York
The drug company Merck may face thousands of lawsuits over its cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (Vioxx) after losing a court case concerning the death from an arrhythmia of a fit 59 year old man from Texas who was taking the drug. The jury awarded his widow $253.4m (£140m; €206m)—$24.4m for economic loss and emotional anguish and $229m in punitive damages. However, the award will be reduced under Texan law to about $26m. Merck has said it will appeal.

Robert Ernst, who died in his sleep in May 2001, had taken rofecoxib (Vioxx) for eight months
Credit: ERNST FAMILY/AP/EMPICS
But Merck faces at least 4200 state and federal lawsuits in the United States by people or their relatives who say they were harmed by the drug.
People elsewhere—the United Kingdom and other European countries, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, and Brazil—are …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Does iron deficiency without anaemia cause fatigue and what is the reason behind it?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Histology of Pilar Cysts - a counsel of perfection?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career
Published 26 May 2012
Re: The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Five years after baby Peter
Published 26 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27