PDF
Easy Read
Respond to this article- Versions
- bmj.38562.690104.43v1
- 331/7512/302 most recent
- Glyn Elwyn, clinician editor of saferhealthcare (elwyng@cardiff.ac.uk),
- Janet M Corrigan, president and chief executive officer
- Centre for Health Sciences Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT
- National Committee for Quality Health Care, 1701 K St NW, Washington DC 20006, USA
Investigating and improving patient safety in health care is now an international phenomenon. The establishment of the National Patient Safety Agency in the United Kingdom1 and of the Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in the United States2 are prime examples of the prominence given to safety within the wider concept of healthcare quality. No longer can there be any doubt that the most fundamental ethical principle in medicine—first, do no harm—is being taken seriously by a wide constituency. The next step is to embed safe practice into everyday clinical behaviour.
Why is there so much interest in patient safety? Why now? Data have been available on error rates in medicine for at least a decade. Although there had been earlier work in the 1970s, the landmark Harvard Medical Practice study of hospital inpatients was published in 1991.3 Additional studies followed from Australia and other contexts.4 This research points to an adverse event rate in secondary care close to 10%. The error rate in primary care is less well studied.
What we know
The catalyst came from the United States. By 1998 some opinion leaders in health care were frustrated by …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27