Editorials

Health and health care in transitional Europe

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7510.169 (Published 21 July 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:169
  1. Kristina Fister, Roger Robinson editorial registrar (kfister{at}bmj.com),
  2. Martin McKee, professor of European public health
  1. BMJ
  2. European Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT

    Evidence based policy making and greater public participation are needed

    In December 2004 we called for papers that would document the impact on population health and on health systems of the transition from communism in Europe and central Asia.w1 Over the past 18 months, a series of events has focused the eyes of the world on this region. May 2004 saw the historic enlargement of the European Union. In Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan, popular uprisings have led to the removal of autocratic regimes; in Uzbekistan, a similar uprising ended in tragedy. Yet, despite coming to the attention of the world's mass media, this vast region characterised by diversity and shared problems has generated surprisingly few publications on health and health care. We hope that this theme issue—most of it contributed by researchers and authors from the region—will fill some of these gaps and will further stimulate much needed monitoring, research, and debate.

    One of the key themes in this week's BMJ theme issue is the rising prevalence of HIV/AIDS in some countries of the region. For example, one paper focuses on Ukraine, which has the highest prevalence of HIV infection in Europe (estimated at 1.4% of the population) but lacks any systematic approach to prevention, treatment, or care.1 The authors report how information on the scale and nature of the problem is patchy and is not well known within Ukraine. An accompanying commentary emphasises the need for urgent international action to prevent a potential catastrophe.w2

    Non-communicable diseases continue to dominate the overall burden of disease in the region.2 Yet some countries have seen marked reductions in mortality,3 and, although precise explanations for this remain a matter for discussion,w3 it is clear that much can be done to tackle the high toll from cardiovascular disease. As Marquez and Suhrcke note, however, continuing improvement will depend on much more evidence and better use of existing evidence4 5 to inform policy, as well as on the creation of systems to collect data regularly on risk factors for chronic disease.

    Low on the policy agenda

    As is so often the case elsewhere, mental health remains low on the policy agenda. There is a great deal to do to overcome the legacy of psychiatry under communist rule. An editorial in this issue draws attention to some of the most pressing issues facing those struggling to care for people with mental disorders in the region.6 The authors call for reliable epidemiological data about the scale of the problem, implementation of evidence based interventions, and collaborative intersectoral work to deliver appropriate care. They also argue for comprehensive policies on mental health that are based on accurate assessments of societal context, populations' needs, and availability of existing services—warning of the dangers that lie ahead if such reforms are inadequately planned and resourced.

    Across this region, health systems have undergone extensive and varied reforms.7 But there is still much to do, particularly in strengthening primary care, which in many places has yet to develop effective prevention and gatekeeping.8 9 Creating a cadre of modern primary care doctors has been a daunting task, facing many obstacles such as inconsistent legislation and weak policy frameworks. An encouraging sign is that, despite limited resources, only a few of the newly trained family doctors have chosen to join the private sector—only 2% in Kosovo and 6% in Russia. Difficulties do not end with completion of retraining, however: many deep rooted cultural and behavioural problems still need to be overcome before primary care can really succeed in the region.10

    One important and deep rooted problem—reported in several papers this week—is corruption, which is undermining efforts to improve health and health care in many parts of the region. Healthcare structures are often too bureaucratic and are designed to satisfy the requirements of potential foreign partners rather than to benefit patients or adhere to adequate moral and ethical standards.11 The lack of a moral framework further complicates the already difficult circumstances in which healthcare reforms take place as, for example, in Hungary.12

    Political transition has yielded mixed fortunes. In too many countries the population remains excluded from the political process. Where democracy has taken root in this region, health has improved,w4 although not yet to the levels seen in western Europe. Many citizens remain insufficiently involved in decisions about their health or the care they receive.13 To participate fully and effectively they need information, and we hope that this theme issue will provide some of it. They also need to realise that they can make a difference.

    Obtaining democratic power has been a slow and painful process in the region. Using that power, its citizens should demand health care in line with the rest of Europe's.

    Footnotes

    • Embedded ImageAdditional references w1-w4 are on bmj.com

      We thank Roza Adany and Vasily Vlassov for their helpful inputs at the initial stage of preparing this theme issue.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    13. 13.
    View Abstract