Meadow defends his role in conviction of Sally Clark

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7508.66-a (Published 7 July 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:66.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
  1. BMJ

    Roy Meadow, the paediatrician who has been vilified in the media for his role in the conviction of Sally Clark for murdering her two babies, broke his silence last week, insisting that he had been a reluctant witness in criminal trials.

    In his opening evidence to the General Medical Council panel that is hearing accusations of serious professional misconduct against him, Professor Meadow said that testifying in court was a “great ordeal” and “unsettling.”

    He is accused of giving “misleading and flawed” statistical evidence in the trial of Mrs Clark, whose …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL