Coping with the aftermath of trauma: Authors' reply

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7507.50-b (Published 30 June 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:50.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Berthold P R Gersons (b.p.gersons@amc.uva.nl), professor of psychiatry,
  2. Miranda Olff, associate professor of psychotraumatology
  1. Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 BC Amsterdam, Netherlands
  2. Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 BC Amsterdam, Netherlands

    EDITOR—Summerfield (and Hopkins et al, in their electronic response1) criticise the narrow, biomedical approach of the guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Summerfield especially argues that the guideline is fundamentally flawed because the problems of a person, even many years after traumatic experiences, are framed within the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Psychological treatment for post-traumatic …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL