Analysis of evidence is incomplete and inaccurate
- John McMurray, professor of medical cardiology (j.mcmurray@bio.gla.ac.uk)1
- 1Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT
Editor—Verma and Strauss say that, compared with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers do not reduce (and may increase) the risk of myocardial infarction.1 Their claim represents an incomplete, inaccurate, and misleading “analysis” of the evidence.
They did not cite the two largest studies that randomised patients to an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers and had the statistical power to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes.2 3 These had twice …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27