- Alison Tonks, associate editor (atonks@bmj.com)
Taking SSRIs or SNRIs in late pregnancy can harm newborns
Women who take selective serotonin or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs or SNRIs) in late pregnancy risk giving their baby a neonatal syndrome characterised by jitteriness, increased muscle tone, feeding difficulties, and sometimes respiratory distress. But the symptoms are often mild, self limiting, and easily managed with supportive measures, say researchers. After a careful look for all reports of the syndrome, they found 13 published case reports, 9 cohort studies, 57 cases reported to the US Food and Drug Administration's adverse events database, and 74 cases reported to the World Health Organization.
Using data from the cohort studies, they estimated that babies whose mothers took these antidepressants during the last trimester were three times more likely to develop neonatal symptoms (risk ratio 3.0, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4), 2.6 (1.4 to 4.7) times more likely to need nursing in a special care unit, and 2.3 (1.6 to 3.2) times more likely to have breathing problems than babies who were not exposed at all, or were exposed earlier in the pregnancy. Reported symptoms were fairly consistent (figure) and lasted no more than two weeks.
We still don't know the risks associated with individual drugs and we still don't know what causes the syndrome, or how to avoid it. The US Food and Drugs Administration recently added a warning label to all SSRIs and SNRIs describing the symptoms and suggesting that women consider tapering the dose in late pregnancy.
Credit: JAMA
JAMA 2005;293: 2372-83
New definition of fasting glucose is poor predictor of cardiovascular disease
In 2003, the American Diabetes Association reduced the lower limit of normal for fasting serum concentration of glucose. Men and women with fasting glucose between 5.6 mmol/l and 6.9 mmol/l are now deemed to have have impaired fasting glucose and a higher risk of diabetes. The new definition triples the number of men and women in the United States …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27