- Peter Braude, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology (obgyn@kcl.ac.uk),
- Stephen L Minger, director of stem cell biology laboratory,
- Ruth M Warwick, consultant haematologist
- Stem Cell Group, Division of Reproductive Health, Endocrinology and Development, Guy's Campus, King's College London SE1 9RT
- Stem Cell Group, Division of Reproductive Health, Endocrinology and Development, Guy's Campus, King's College London SE1 9RT
- Tissue Services, National Blood Service, Edgware HA8 9BD
- Accepted 13 May 2005
Safety and quality must be assured before this treatment can really benefit patients
The use of human embryonic stem cells has been hailed as the next major step in the battle against serious degenerative disorders, such as diabetes and heart disease, and for some debilitating or lethal neurological diseases, such as Parkinson's and motor neurone disease. News reports and promotional material on websites often convey the impression that this therapy is safe and immediately or imminently available. Whether this is just hype, and how much hope patients should invest in this technology, are issues being discussed at a public debate in London this week.w1
Although the number of human embryonic stem cell lines has increased considerably in the past two years, few of these have been well characterised, and large hurdles still need to be overcome to ensure safety and efficacy.1 These will require substantial further investment and research. Stem cells have not yet been grown in the conditions that would be expected for any pharmaceutical product destined for use in vivo.2 Even the embryos from which human embryonic stem cells could be derived are still cultured in vitro in …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012