Reviews TV House BMJ 2005; 330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1090 (Published 05 May 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:1090 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editor's Choice Critical thinking Published: 23 April 2009; BMJ 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b1662 Letter Why clinicians are natural bayesians: Is there a bayesian doctor in the house? Published: 09 June 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-b See more Introductory Address Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1 Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond's Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10 Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical Profession Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13 An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive Letterpress Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4 A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &c Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a Cited by... Why clinicians are natural bayesians: Is there a bayesian doctor in the house?Fulltext Why clinicians are natural bayesians: Bayesian confusionFulltext