Presentation of benefits and harms needs to be balanced
- Peter C G⊘tzsche, director (pcg@cochrane.dk),
- Hazel Thornton, honorary visiting fellow,
- Karsten J J⊘rgensen, physician
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet Department, 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet Department, 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
EDITOR—Olsen et al found a 25% reduction in breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen compared with what they would expect to find in the absence of screening.1 They did an observational study, which is not considered to be a reliable method for evaluating mortality reductions with screening. …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27