Shared help seeking behaviour within families: a retrospective cohort study

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38411.378229.E0 (Published 14 April 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:882
  1. M Cardol, researcher (m.cardol{at}nivel.nl)1,
  2. P P Groenewegen, professor1,
  3. D H de Bakker, senior researcher1,
  4. P Spreeuwenberg, statistician1,
  5. L van Dijk, senior researcher1,
  6. W van den Bosch, professor2
  1. 1 NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3800 BN Utrecht, Netherlands,
  2. 2 Department of General Practice, UMCN St Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to: M Cardol

    Abstract

    Objective To examine the extent to which the family influences individual use of general practitioner care.

    Design Retrospective cohort study of all consultations in one calendar year. Multilevel modelling was used to analyse contact frequencies of individuals within families within practices.

    Setting General practice in the Netherlands.

    Participants 42 262 families with children aged 2-21 years registered in 96 practices.

    Main outcome measures Family influence on individual frequency of contact with general practice and correlation in frequency of contacts between parents and children.

    Results After correction for patients' age and sex, analysis of siblings indicates that 22% of the variance in frequencies of contact can be ascribed to influence of the family. This means that contact frequencies of family members within families resemble each other, whereas differences in contact frequencies exist between families. Almost 6% of the variance refers to differences between practices and 73% of the variance refers to individual differences. The strongest correlations were found between mothers and children and between children.

    Conclusions The extent of shared help seeking behaviour within families has considerable implications in the context of the practice.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors All authors were responsible for conception and design, and revision and final approval of the paper. MC, PS, and PPG analysed and interpreted the data. MC drafted the paper. MC, PPG, and DHdeB are guarantors.

    • Funding Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).

    • Conflict of interest None declared.

    • Ethical approval Not required.

      THIS WEEK'S POLL