- Barbara Stocking, director
- Oxfam
Even before I was asked to review this book I knew I would have to read it, as the World Bank probably has more influence, for good or ill, on poverty and development than any other institution in the world. Understanding how it has worked in the last 10 years under its controversial leader is very important. I didn't expect to enjoy the book, so I was pleasantly surprised: it was gripping.

Sebastian Mallaby
Yale University Press, £19.95, pp 462 ISBN 0 300 10801 X http://www.yalebooks.co.uk/
Rating:


When James Wolfensohn arrived at the bank in 1995 it was at a dangerous moment in its history. Robert MacNamara's earlier vision of poverty reduction had faded, and the bank had become cautious, technocratic, and out of touch with the effects of its policies on poverty. It was under severe challenge from non-governmental organisations (NGOs), including my own, Oxfam, because its structural adjustment policies were making poor people poorer by reducing public services such as health and education, as well as taking away support to poor farmers. As a result of the rise in oil prices and the decline in income from other commodities, many poor countries had also built up enormous debt, and NGOs were calling for debt relief—although this was ignored by the bank.
Wolfensohn was up …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27