Editorial

HIV testing

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7490.492 (Published 03 March 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:492
  1. Kaveh Manavi, specialist registrar in genitourinary medicine (tirbad@yahoo.com),
  2. Philip D Welsby, consultant in infectious diseases
  1. Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 1EW

    Should no longer be accorded any special status

    Before highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was introduced, the advantages to infected individuals of knowing their HIV status were minimal, and counselling before HIV testing was the recommended practice.1 This usually limited testing, by relying on people who were obviously at risk presenting themselves for testing. Such groups included injecting drug users and men who have sex with men and their sexual contacts. Targeting of these groups will become an increasingly less useful concept as HIV continues to spread into the population that is conventionally not at risk. Do we need to reconsider if routine voluntary counselling and testing is appropriate today?

    Since 1991 heterosexual transmission of HIV has been the most common mode of transmission in the United Kingdom.2 Currently, nearly half of those infected heterosexually and a quarter of infected men who have sex with men in the United Kingdom are undiagnosed.3 A quarter …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe