patients may be less risk averse than committees

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7489.471 (Published 24 February 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:471

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Shirley Nurock (s_nurock@hotmail.com), London region coordinator, Alzheimer's Society quality research in dementia consumer network1
  1. 1 London SW3 4BD

    Ethical considerations should apply to all medical practice and interventions that affect patients. This should include social caregiving, which at present is not seen as being in need of moral or ethical consideration. And if audit is potentially more likely to lead to change than research, as Wade claims,1 clearly it should be given equal consideration and outcomes followed up.

    Sometimes, however, it feels as though ethics committees are putting up barriers to much needed research. As a former carer for my husband, a general practitioner who developed Alzheimer's disease in his 50s, I …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL