BMA chairman responds
- James Johnson (jjohnson@bma.org.uk), chairman, BMA Council
- BMA House, London WC1H 9JP
EDITOR—The BMJ's rigorously exercised editorial independence is well shown, but lest Editor's choice and Smith's editorial on the General Medical Council are mistaken for BMA policy, I emphasise that these were not the BMA's views in the wake of the fifth report of the Shipman inquiry.1 2
Richard Smith, a long-term critic of the GMC, says that Dame Janet Smith finds deficiencies in the GMC's new fitness to practise procedures introduced in November 2004. Would it not be sensible to allow the new system a chance to prove itself before condemning its existence? In chapter 27 of her latest …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27